Appealing Wisconsin

If the decision stands, "the line between prohibited and unprohibited discrimination will be drawn by law enforcement charging decisions."

"The question is whether these accepted (interview) techniques become coercive if the defendant is under 18."

"When he asked whether he can return to his pod, it was in a tone which suggested he was musing about the possibility."

" 'Some uncertainty at the margins does not condemn a statute.' "

The statutory definition of "vote" confirms a broad interpretation is correct, they said.

You can now subscribe to updates from Appealing Wisconsin! Click on the "Subscribe" tab at the top of the page to receive email updates...

The Planned Parenthood plaintiffs in an abortion rights case pending before the state Supreme Court oppose Milwaukee Archbishop Jerome...

This post was update Aug. 8, 2024 to correct the names of the attorneys representing Chisholm. Oops. Too many open windows. You can now...

More problematic is when a court guesses when a payor will retire and ending maintenance at that point.

The appellate court ruled that "arrests" referred only to arrests for criminal offenses, not municipal offenses.